Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 64(5): 770-80, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24833203

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Information is limited regarding utilization patterns and costs for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) medications in Medicare Part D-enrolled dialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Annual cohorts of dialysis patients, 2007-2010. PREDICTORS: Cohort year, low-income subsidy status, and dialysis provider. OUTCOMES: Utilization and costs of prescription phosphate binders, oral and intravenous vitamin D analogues, and cinacalcet. MEASUREMENTS: Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds of medication use for low-income subsidy versus non-low-income subsidy patients and for patients from various dialysis organizations, and we report per-member-per-month and average out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: Phosphate binders (∼83%) and intravenous vitamin D (77.5%-79.3%) were the most commonly used CKD-MBD medications in 2007 through 2010. The adjusted odds of prescription phosphate-binder, intravenous vitamin D, and cinacalcet use were significantly higher for low-income subsidy than for non-low-income subsidy patients. Total Part D versus CKD-MBD Part D medication costs increased 22% versus 36% from 2007 to 2010. For Part D-enrolled dialysis patients, CKD-MBD medications represented ∼50% of overall net Part D costs in 2010. LIMITATIONS: Inability to describe utilization and costs of calcium carbonate, an over-the-counter agent not covered under Medicare Part D; inability to reliably identify prescriptions filled through a non-Part D reimbursement or payment mechanism; findings may not apply to dialysis patients without Medicare Part D benefits or with Medicare Advantage plans, or to pediatric dialysis patients; could identify only prescription drugs dispensed in the outpatient setting; inability to adjust for MBD laboratory values. CONCLUSIONS: Part D net costs for CKD-MBD medications increased at a faster rate than costs for all Part D medications in dialysis patients despite relatively stable use within medication classes. In a bundled environment, there may be incentives to shift to generic phosphate binders and reduce cinacalcet use.


Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas/economia , Doenças Ósseas/terapia , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Medicare Part D/economia , Diálise Renal/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Ósseas/epidemiologia , Cinacalcete , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naftalenos/economia , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/economia , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/uso terapêutico , Pobreza/economia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vitamina D/economia , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 22(5): 1428-36, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308322

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common side effect of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is associated with increased risk of fracture and cardiovascular events (CV). Current standard treatment includes dietary control, phosphate binders and vitamin D. However, many patients do not have their parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphate levels controlled by this regimen. Cinacalcet is the first of a new class of calcimimetic drugs which suppress PTH production. Although there is convincing evidence of the impact of cinacalcet on serum biomarkers, the long-term clinical implications of treatment are less clear. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-utility of cinacalcet as an addition to standard treatment of SHPT compared with standard treatment alone. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the incremental cost-utility of cinacalcet. Uncertainty was explored through extensive sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared with standard treatment, cinacalcet incurs average additional lifetime costs of pound21,167 per person and confers an additional 0.34 quality adjusted life years, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound61,890 (approximately euro89,000) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Extensive one-way sensitivity analysis showed that cinacalcet was only likely to be considered cost-effective if the relative risk of mortality for people with very high levels of PTH was 2.2 compared with people whose PTH reached target levels, or if drug costs were considerably reduced. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cinacalcet was very unlikely to be cost-effective at usual levels of willingness to pay in the National Health Service (NHS). CONCLUSION: Unless the cost of cinacalcet is considerably reduced, it is unlikely to be considered a cost-effective treatment for people with SHPT.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/economia , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Naftalenos/economia , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Cinacalcete , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dietoterapia/economia , Dietoterapia/métodos , Custos de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hormônio Paratireóideo/metabolismo , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/economia , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Reino Unido , Vitamina D/economia , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico
3.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 16 Suppl 2: S120-7, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16251247

RESUMO

In 2003, more than 320,000 people in the United States were receiving dialysis for ESRD, with predicted increases to 650,000 by 2010 and 2 million by 2030. Mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with ESRD is 10 to 30 times higher than in the general population. The exact mechanism of accelerated CVD in patients with kidney disease is unknown. Treatment costs for ESRD are in excess of $14 billion annually (6.4% of Medicare budget). Strategies to improve long-term outcomes include aggressive risk factor modification, minimization of dialysis complications, and kidney transplantation. Because abnormalities of mineral metabolism contribute to mortality risk, phosphate binder therapy is fundamental. More expensive non-calcium-containing phosphate binders such as sevelamer have been recommended to reduce cardiovascular calcification. However, the lack of outcome data and the $2 to $3 billion annual cost make it difficult to justify widespread utilization of newer binders as first-line therapy. Conversely, kidney transplantation is known to improve survival in ESRD. Progression of atherosclerosis and CVD in patients with renal failure is largely due to loss of renal function per se, and provision of a functioning kidney through renal transplantation halts the progression of CVD and dramatically reduces mortality. Despite this fact, many patients lose Medicare funding for immunosuppressive therapy 3 yr posttransplantation. To achieve the goal of prevention of cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESRD, it clearly would be more prudent, efficacious, and cost-effective to use Medicare prescription drug dollars to provide full coverage for life-long immunosuppressive drug therapy after renal transplantation.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/economia , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...